Animal Kingdom is an Australian film directed by
David Michôd that tells the story of Joshua (
James Frecheville) who, after his mother OD's, goes to live with his grandmother (
Jacki Weaver) and his uncles who are all involved in organized crime. One of his uncles, whom everyone refers to as Pope (
Ben Mendelsohn), is in hiding after committing armed robbery, and Joshua learns that the police have been staking out his family's homes for nearly a week. When family friend and crime accomplice Barry (
Joel Edgerton) is killed by police after meeting with Pope, he and his brothers Darren (
Luke Ford) and Craig (
Sullivan Stapleton) retaliate by killing two officers on their own. The police quickly move in on the family, bringing all of them men into custody. A detective named Leckie (
Guy Pearce) questions Josh and tries to get him to sell out his family, and Josh struggles with the decision for the remainder of the film.
To be honest, I was very excited about watching this film, but for the majority of it, I was pretty disappointed. The screenplay didn't seem all that tight, and I wasn't really hooked into the story as much as I would have liked. All of the situations just kept moving forward, but I couldn't really find a reason to care about the characters. I mean, it's not that the screenplay is bad, but it wasn't as spectacular as I had heard. However, it did offer a little bit of redemption towards the end of the film, saving
Animal Kingdom from a C-range grade.
In addition, I wasn't terribly impressed with the acting ensemble. Sure, there are some good pieces here and there - Edgerton and Stapleton are both very good and utterly captivating when they're on-screen - but I'd heard so many accolades about the cast, and they didn't necessarily deliver for me. In fact, Weaver has garnered a supporting actress nomination at the upcoming Golden Globes, but I couldn't really see why. She's good, but she's nothing spectacular. I guess I could say that about most of the rest of the cast. They're just about par for the course, but there's no one really pushing themselves forward to stand out.
Just a quick side note: I had some issues with the music and the score in the film. Now, when I'm calculating my scores and grades, music does play a part. For me, a good score or good use or music will either complement a film well or fit so seamlessly that you know it's there but it's not pushing itself to the forefront. On the opposite end of the spectrum, a bad score will stand out and take you away from the story because that's all you'll continue to hear, and that was the problem I had with the score in
Animal Kingdom. It stuck out so much and so often that there were moments where I missed dialogue because the music just screamed to be heard. And that's not good.
Overall,
Animal Kingdom is worth watching, although it's not quite what I had expected it to be. I feel as though there was the potential for greatness here, but it just lets up in every facet a little too early. Maybe on another viewing, I'd like it more, but for now, it just leaves a little bit to be desired.
Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B
Thumb... Mostly Up
Addition to Awards
2010: 1 nomination