Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Paul Giamatti. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Giamatti. Show all posts

Friday, June 15, 2012

Movie Review: ROCK OF AGES

ROCK OF AGES
2012
PG-13


"This place is about to become a sea of sweat, ear-shattering music and puke."
-- Dennis Dupree

Rock of Ages is a 2012 dramatic musical film directed by Adam Shankman that serves as a big-screen adaptation of the off-Broadway musical of the same name. The film opens in 1987 with Sherrie Christian (Julianne Hough) on a bus from her native Oklahoma to Los Angeles, where she hopes to find fame and fortune. Shortly after arriving, however, she's mugged and finds herself lost and nearly penniless. Enter young aspiring singer Drew Boley (Diego Boneta) who manages to get her a job at a popular nightclub called The Bourbon Room. The famed venue, however, has hit a recent string of financial troubles, and owner Dennis Dupree (Alec Baldwin) and his partner Lonny (Russell Brand) are desperately trying to keep the Bourbon Room afloat all while dealing with the ultra-right-wing wife (Catherine Zeta-Jones) of the city mayor. In a bit of luck, they manage to book the final performance of a band called Arsenal, which is fronted by superstar rocker Stacee Jaxx (Tom Cruise). As the night of the massive performance draws near, however, relationships between each of the characters begin to strain, causing a massage amount of upheaval inside The Bourbon Room.

I would like to start by saying that, while I have long wanted to see Rock of Ages in its stage incarnation, I have never had the opportunity. Therefore, I went into the film version a little bit blind, seeing the storyline for the first time. All I knew entering the film was that it was all about rock 'n roll and that Tom Cruise was supposedly going to sing. And always being up for a bit of rock music, I figured I'd have a excellent time. Cue the "Bill & Ted" guitar riff.

Unfortunately, Rock of Ages is missing a few notes here and there. One of the biggest problems with the film is that we're getting a rather humdrum screenplay that's about as predictable as you can get. From the opening scene, we know exactly what direction the film is headed, and that takes a little bit away from the film. If the audience knows how the film's going to end, then what's the point of enjoying the ride? Sometimes the ride is enough to keep a viewer engaged, but if we're simply going off the storyline and the plot devices, then Rock of Ages is sinking, and sinking fast.

Also, we're not getting a ton of help from the cast, at least in terms of their acting. Despite the fact that the film holds an all-star cast, I couldn't really find anything terribly redeeming about the acting portion of the performances. Our film's leads - Hough and Boneta - are both a little too laughable from time to time, and they manage to chew the scenery just a little too much. Cruise is decent, but it's nowhere near his best on-screen role. And to be honest, it was a little bit strange seeing him portray sexual rock 'n roll god. He's never been an overt sex symbol during his career, and to have him try to bring that to the table at his current age just seems a little bit weird. We get a bit of nice interplay between Brand and Baldwin, who probably offer the film's best performances. And still, they're only serviceable. Even great actors like Paul Giamatti and Bryan Cranston can't bring this film any higher. Also be on the watch for decent bit pieces from Malin Akerman and Mary J. Blige, as well as cameos from Will Forte, Eli Roth and T.J. Miller.

Now, I only said that the acting portions of the cast's performances were a little lackluster. Where Rock of Ages does manage to excel is in its soundtrack, and each of the performers brings their A-game for that part of the film. I was thoroughly impressed with Hough and Boneta as our stars, and even Cruise manages to bust out a few songs relatively well. Brand, as you may already know, is a fantastic singer, and his bits are glorious indeed. Even Baldwin and Giamatti manage to sing a few lines here and there, and it works to a nice effect. However, the real glory I think belongs to Boneta, who proves to be - arguably - the best singer of the bunch, and he has some of the most opportunity to belt it out. He even manages to overshadow Hough, which is surprising considering she's also very good. Overall, the soundtrack is fantastic, and I thought that some of the song mash-ups worked relatively well.

At the end of the day, however, Rock of Ages simply isn't that great of a film. It has a shoddy screenplay and weak character development, and normally, that would be enough to doom any movie. However, with a stellar soundtrack like this one has, it's tough not to have fun with Rock of Ages. Anyone who's a fan of this particular genre of rock 'n roll is going to get caught up in the emotion of the songs, and that might lead a viewer to believe they're having an emotional connection with the film. I'd bet that won't be the case, seeing as if you take away the music, then this film's about as devoid of emotion as you can get. It's the music that proves to be the glue in the film, keeping it together just long enough to keep the audience entertained from start to finish.


Movie Review Summary
Grade: C
Should You Watch It? Maybe

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Happy Birthday, Paul Giamatti!

Today, we're celebrating the 45th birthday of Academy Award-nominated actor Paul Giamatti. A Connecticut native, Paul is the son of the late Bart Giamatti, who served as both President of Yale University as well as Commissioner of Major League Baseball. Paul himself attended Yale, where he began his acting career in their theater department. From there, he channeled his energies to regional productions before finding his start on the big screen in the early 1990s. He married his wife Elizabeth in 1997, and the two remain happily married to this day. Here's a look at some of the fun facts and accolades that Giamatti has earned throughout his acting career:


Acting
First Film: Past Midnight (1991)
Last Film: The Ides of March (2011)
Next Film: Rock of Ages (2012)

Academy Awards
Nominated: Best Supporting Actor, Cinderella Man (2005)

Over the years, I've managed to see thirteen of Giamatti's films, and on average, his films have received a 'B-' grade. From these thirteen, I have created the following list of my five favorite of his performances:

5. Mike Flaherty
Win Win (2011)

*****

4. Joe Gould
Cinderella Man (2005)

*****

3. Miles
Sideways (2004)

*****

2. Tom Duffy
The Ides of March (2011)

*****

1. Harvey Pekar
American Splendor (2003)

Once again, I would like to wish Paul Giamatti a happy 45th birthday!

Monday, January 2, 2012

Movie Review: THE IDES OF MARCH

THE IDES OF MARCH
2011
R


"All the reporters love you. Even the reporters that hate you still love you."
-- Tom Duffy


The Ides of March is a 2011 dramatic film directed by George Clooney that serves as an adaptation of the 2008 play Farragut North and follows the story of a Presidential campaign as it looks to secure the Democratic nomination for its candidate. The film opens on the young Stephen Meyers (Ryan Gosling), who is working towards securing a win in the Ohio primary for Presidential candidate Mike Morris (Clooney). Meyers and Senior Campaign Manager Paul Zara (Philip Seymour Hoffman) are desperately trying to secure the endorsement of North Carolina Senator Thompson (Jeffrey Wright), which would effectively wrap up the nomination for Morris, but opposing campaign manager Tom Duffy (Paul Giamatti) is sure that his candidate will reel Thompson in. Realizing that Meyers is the smartest mind in the game, Duffy attempts to draw him toward his side of the playing field, but Meyers refuses. Around the same time, Meyers starts a physical relationship with a campaign intern named Molly Stearns (Evan Rachel Wood), who happens to be the daughter of the head of the Democratic National Convention. As time passes, however, Meyers starts to realize that Molly might hold a key towards Morris's ultimate downfall.

When I first heard about this film, I was initially drawn to the fact that it would be Clooney-directed. Only his fourth directorial effort, he has managed to have relative success in the past, so I was interested to see how he would take on directing efforts again. As I started to hear how about the cast list, however, my excitement grew tenfold. When you can find a way to put the likes of Gosling, Hoffman, Giamatti and Clooney in the same film, there's bound to be some buzz. And four Golden Globe nominations later, I'd say that The Ides of March has been able to succeed to quite a degree. I suppose we'll have to wait and see how it fares come the announcement of Academy Award nominations.

The first thing I noticed about this film was how tight the screenplay actually proved to be. From the outside looking in, this may look like a political drama that's going to get into the dogfight between two candidates looking to represent their party for the Presidency. And while we do get a little bit of that, there's something a little bit deeper going on here. If the film were solely focusing on campaign itself, I feel as though we would have seen a little more of Clooney; however, Gosling proves to be our lead here, and the story truly revolves around him. And that's where the screenplay truly succeeds. Instead of all the ins and outs of the campaign trail, the audience is served a fantastically-crafted character arc. Gosling's Meyers starts out as a wide-eyed young man full of promise and faith in the political process. As the events of the film progress, however, Meyers starts to lose that faith and sees the political process for what it truly is: a dog-eat-dog world where anything will be done in order to ensure a candidate's success. There's a moment in the film where Giamatti's Duffy tells Meyers that he should get out of the political lifestyle before he winds up "being a jaded, cynical asshole" like himself. Despite the warnings, we as the audience see Meyers dig himself deep into the depths of cynicism, ultimately coming full circle by film's end. The blend of character arc with fantastic story makes this a screenplay to love.

I'd also like to take a moment to talk about how the film's title plays into the overall storyline. The Ides of March, translated from the Latin Idus Martii, refers to the fifteenth day of March, specifically; however, the term has an incredibly relevant place in history and literature. The date is best known as the day that Julius Caesar was murdered by conspirators in 44 B.C. Supposedly, a seer had told Caesar that harm would come to him by the Ides of March, a scene that was famously dramatized in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar where the seer tells Caesar to "beware the Ides of March." The story of this betrayal parallels perfectly to our film, in which a number of betrayals must occur for our final outcome to be realized. In a way, the film's title should tip you off to what you're about to see, but for those of us who may have been unfamiliar with the importance of the Ides of March, the idea may have been lost. Just an extra bit of fun for those who understand, I suppose.

Fortunately, we're also given a fantastic cast that play their individual parts to a tee. Our big three in Gosling, Hoffman and Clooney are great, and their interplay with one another proves to be some of the best scenes in the film (for example, be on the lookout for a scene where Gosling confronts Clooney about some of the events of the film). Giamatti is brilliant in his limited supporting role, bringing a ferocity to the screen that's unmatched by anyone else in the film. Wood brings a fine performance as our female lead, and although she didn't have much to work with in terms of the screenplay, she still manages to bring out a great performance. Also be on the watch for Marisa Tomei in a limited but important role.

Overall, The Ides of March is a fantastic film all-around, from screenplay to acting to direction. Everything is firing on all cylinders here, and even though it's not bringing us anything terribly shocking, there's still a fantastic character arc to follow and enjoy. If that's your only reason to watch this film, then I'm sure you won't be disappointed.



Movie Review Summary
Grade: A-
2 Thumbs Up

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Movie Review: THE HANGOVER PART II

THE HANGOVER PART II
2011
R



The Hangover Part II is a 2011 comedy film directed by Todd Phillips that serves as a sequel to the 2009 smash-hit, The Hangover. This time around, we're heading off to Thailand as Stu (Ed Helms) prepares to marry Lauren (Jamie Chung). As one can imagine, his best friends Phil (Bradley Cooper) and Doug (Justin Bartha) are headed there as well, and a late addition sees the slightly-troubled Alan (Zach Galifianakis) also attending the wedding. Much to Stu's reluctance, he's talked into having a beer after a pre-wedding party, and fans of the original film will know exactly where the film is going. The following morning, Stu, Phil and Alan awaken in a seedy motel in Bangkok without any memory of the night before. The key difference, however, is that they haven't lost Doug; instead, they've managed to lose Lauren's sixteen-year-old brother Teddy (Mason Lee). As they try to piece together the events of the previous night in order to find their lost friend, they utilize the help of a familiar face in Mr. Chow (Ken Jeong), whose status as an international criminal only muddies their plans.

After The Hangover raked in nearly $280 million in the United States and garnered a Golden Globe win for Best Musical or Comedy, anyone could've guessed that a sequel loomed somewhere on the horizon. Rather than take us back to Las Vegas, the screenwriters chose to take us somewhere a little more exotic. I personally think that Thailand proved to be a perfect choice, considering a lot of the stereotypes that we Westerners have concerning the seedy areas there. So as one can imagine, I had high hopes going into this flick.

Unfortunately, Part II didn't really reach those expectations, at least for me. Everyone in my theater was rolling with laughter, and while I did laugh quite a bit, I couldn't quite see how any of it was different than the previous film. Aside from the locale, Part II seemed more like a remake than a sequel. A lot of the jokes seemed forced, and the best ones were the ones that directly referenced the events of the original film. Yes, some of the jokes are grand, but for the most part, it all felt a little bit stale to me.

Even the level of acting was a little below where it was in the original film. Our lead trio (Helms, Cooper and Galifianakis) should have been the most consistent, but only Galifianakis brings anything close to an A-game. Cooper and Helms are essentially carbon-copies of their previous personas, and while Galifianakis doesn't offer anything drastically different, his character still seems a little bit fresh. Ken Jeong is easily the best part of the film, bringing a much-needed manic energy that the rest of the actors somehow forgot to bring. I was completely glued to the screen whenever Jeong happened to grace it, and I only wish we could've gotten a little bit more. Oh, and Paul Giamatti makes a bit of an extended cameo, but I'm still debating whether it was entirely necessary.

(On a side note, those of you who read my breakdown of the film's original teaser trailer know that I said Liam Neeson would be making a cameo appearance in lieu of the preferred Mel Gibson. I can sadly report that neither of them appears in the film, so don't get your hopes up.)

Ultimately, The Hangover Part II just seemed a little bit off throughout its entire run-time. I think my sister put it best when she said that the original film offered a shock value that no one was really expecting. Because the first film had pushed the limits so far, we came to expect that the sequel would try to do the same. Yes, there's still quite a bit of shock value in Part II, but I think that the audience - and especially myself - was a little more braced for what we were about to see. And I think that works against the film even if it shouldn't. It's terribly difficult to make a sequel that outdoes the original, and Part II doesn't quite reach the level of the original. That's not to say it's not entertaining. I'll be the first to admit that I laughed quite a bit, but that pang of originality that surrounded the original film simply didn't translate to this one.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B-
1 Thumb Up

Friday, April 1, 2011

Movie Review: WIN WIN

WIN WIN
2011
R



Win Win is a 2011 dramatic comedy directed by Thomas McCarthy. It follows a struggling lawyer named Mike Flaherty (Paul Giamatti) who moonlights as the local high school's wrestling coach. When one of Mike's elderly clients named Leo (Burt Young) receives a court order to be placed into a nursing home, he steps up and takes on Leo's guardianship so that he can rake in the monthly check associated with the title. He doesn't tell his wife Jackie (Amy Ryan) about the decision; instead, he just acts like nothing has changed and life has continued to move at its regular pace. Things become complicated when Leo's estranged grandson Kyle (Alex Shaffer) shows up on his doorstep in the hopes of living with his grandfather. Because his mother (Melanie Lynskey) is in rehab, Mike and Jackie agree to take care of Kyle until his mother can come get him. Mike quickly learns that the very quiet boy has a knack for wrestling. He quickly enrolls Kyle in the high school in order to get him onto the team, and the wins start to come from there. Everything seems to be going great until Kyle's mother shows up unannounced, asking to take both Kyle and Leo back home.

I'm sure this isn't the first film that a lot of you would be rushing to see in theaters this weekend, but it might be better than you all would think. I've long been a Giamatti fan, so when I heard Win Win was actually playing somewhere near me, I jumped at the chance to see him in action. Now, he's not quite as good as he's been in the past, but Giamatti is so refreshing an actor - in that he brings such a different type of character to the screen - that he alone almost makes Win Win a must-see.

The fact that he's surrounded by some other great performances also helps this movie's cause. Ryan is very good in a supporting role, complimenting Giamatti's quirkiness quite well. Lynskey provides a few emotional scenes, and Young is very good as an elderly man succumbing to dementia. We even get a steady string of laughs from Mike's best friend Terry (Bobby Cannavale). However, a lot should be said of young Alex Shaffer, making his first appearance in any type of film (according to IMDb). Although he's not phenomenal, he brings a very raw performance to the screen that proves to be very, very good. As time goes by, I think he has the potential to hone his craft and become a truly great actor, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.

All of that is not to say that Win Win completely...well, wins, for lack of a better term. I did have a little bit of issue with the screenplay, if only that it's entirely predictable. You can see the twists and turns coming from a mile away, and the ultimate resolution is also telegraphed a little too strongly. The dialogue is quite good, and the character arcs are good enough to be believable, but the actual story is a little bit slow. Maybe that's just me, picking up on it a little too quickly. Then again, I'm not the smartest guy in the world, so if I'm figuring out the ending in the first twenty minutes, then I'm sure a lot of other people are as well.

Still, Win Win is a very entertaining movie that's filled with comedy but also delves into the dramatic time and again. It's paced very well, and the pure presence that Giamatti brings to his role makes it almost worth the price of an admission ticket. Again, maybe that's just me. For everyone not obsessed with Mr. Giamatti, Win Win might be better off as a future rental. Either way, I don't think you're going to hate it by any means.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B
1.5 Thumbs Up