Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Jane Lynch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane Lynch. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2011

Movie Review: PAUL

PAUL
2011
R



Paul is a 2011 sci-fi comedy directed by Greg Mottola. It follows two nerdy Brits - Clive (Nick Frost) and Graeme (Simon Pegg) - as they travel the United States in search of famous locations of alien encounter after spending time at Comic-Con in San Diego. As they're making their way across the American Southwest in their rented RV, they watch as a smaller car spins out of control in front of them in the middle of the highway in the middle of the night. When the two get out to investigate, they meet Paul (voiced by Seth Rogen), an human-savvy extra-terrestrial who claims to be on the lam from some sort of government agency. The two men reluctantly agree to help Paul in reaching his final destination, which he only says lies somewhere north of their present location. The trio starts their quest for this place, encountering opposition from a special agent named Zoil (Jason Bateman) while befriending a lonely, intelligent design-ist named Ruth Buggs (Kristen Wiig). The group slowly makes their way towards their final destination where Paul hopes to leave Earth for good.

I've known about Paul for quite a while, mostly because of my slight obsession with the past endeavors of Simon Pegg and Nick Frost. They smashed onto the movie scene with 2004's Shaun of the Dead and upped the ante with 2007's Hot Fuzz. In both films, they turned a certain film type (zombie/romantic comedy and buddy cop flick, respectively) on their ears, and with Paul, they were trying to do the same with the sci-fi adventure. And while it's not quite at the level of their previous two films, Pegg and Frost definitely do enough with this one to make it an enjoyable venture.

The storyline really isn't much to applaud. We've basically got your standard road trip flick infused with some teenage-oriented raunchy comedy to fill our appetites. I'm sure that alone doesn't sound entirely appealing, but for this group of people, it finds a way to work. However, the real strength with the screenplay is the references to classic films past. Like Rango, Paul pays rather often homage to the great films that have come before it. Here's a short list of the films that I definitely found reference to: Raiders of the Lost Ark, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, Star Wars, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Jaws, Lorenzo's Oil, The Karate Kid, and Back to the Future. Some of the references are larger than others - Star Wars and Close Encounters get their respectful due - but this proves to be a movie that will appeal to those geeks (like me!) who have seen films like the ones listed above.

The level of acting also isn't quite up to the standards that Pegg/Frost films have set in the past, but it's good enough for you to care about the characters on-screen. Pegg and Frost may deliver characters most like their actual personalities in this one, making this one really seem like a labor of love. Wiig is good for a few hilarious scenes as she gets over her obsession with intelligent design. And Rogen is actually very good as the titular character. I think he works best as a voice actor - we get that distinctive voice without actually having to see him act. In addition to the aforementioned actors, be on the lookout for the following actors: Jeffrey Tambor, Jane Lynch, David Koechner, Sigourney Weaver, Bill Hader, Joe Lo Truglio, Blythe Danner, and even a voiced cameo from Steven Spielberg.

All in all, Paul is a fine addition to the Pegg/Frost partnership despite not being quite up to snuff with its predecessors. It's still a fun watch, especially if you're a fan of these two clowns. And if you're a fan of the classic sci-fi films from years past, you should probably do yourself a favor and take in Paul while you can before he blasts off and leaves Earth for good.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B
2 Thumbs Up

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Movie Review: THE FUGITIVE

THE FUGITIVE
1993
PG-13



The Fugitive is a 1993 action film directed by Andrew Davis. It follows the story of Dr. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford), a renowned surgeon who is wrongfully accused and imprisoned for the murder of his wife Helen (Sela Ward). While being transferred to another penitentiary, Kimble's bus tumbles down a hill before being struck by an oncoming train. He survives the crash and makes his escape. Shortly after, U.S. Marshal Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones) is called to the scene in the hopes that he will be able to find the missing fugitive. As the two men play their cat-and-mouse game, Kimble also strives to find the real culprit behind his wife's untimely death: a one-armed man with whom he fought on that fateful night. As both men do their best to apprehend their respective quarry, they fall deeper and deeper into an ever-thickening plot that includes some of Kimble's physician colleagues as well as a major pharmaceutical company.

Now, The Fugitive is an Oscar-winning film that also garnered a nomination for Best Picture back in 1994. It ultimately lost to Schindler's List but was also running against In the Name of the Father, The Piano and The Remains of the Day. I've only seen the first two of those films mentioned, but based on those, I don't quite think The Fugitive is really anywhere close to the same wavelength. Schindler's currently sits at #17 on my list of all-time greatest movies, and In the Name of the Father rests at #73. The Fugitive couldn't even make it onto my list of the top 50 action/adventure films. But that's not to say that it's a bad movie.

I'm going to start with acting this time around because I have less negative to say about all that. Harrison Ford is effective as our emotional lead, and he actually has a couple of moments of near-greatness. Ford has never been the most stellar actor, riding more on the bravado of his characters (see: Han Solo and Indiana Jones) more than anything else. When it comes to dramatic acting, however, I doubt Ford would be your first, second, or tenth choice. He does have a couple of good, emotional scenes early in the film, but he quickly turns into the man who has to run and hide (which makes sense, considering he IS a fugitive...). Jones provides much of the bravado - and the comic relief - in the movie, which helps to lighten the mood a little bit. He scored an Oscar statuette for his supporting performance, but I'm not entirely sure he should've beaten the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio (What's Eating Gilbert Grape), Ralph Fiennes (Schindler's List), John Malkovich (In the Line of Fire), and Pete Postlethwaite (In the Name of the Father). There are a couple recognizable faces that have smaller roles in The Fugitive: be on the lookout for Joe Pantoliano, Julianne Moore, Jane Lynch and Neil Flynn.

The actual storyline isn't all that terrible. We're given a number of plot twists as we go through the motions, so the film does enough to keep the audience's interest. However, it seemed as though the film was a little too rote and conventional for my personal tastes. I never once felt like Kimble was in any real danger of having to go back to prison. Yeah, I guess there's gotta be a little bit of a happy ending, but even in the early going, I always knew that Kimble was going to figure everything out. Also, from the moment we see the film's villain for the first time (I won't say who it is, just to keep a little bit of mystery), I knew that he would be the villain even though you technically don't know until late in the story. It just all seemed a little too predictable for me. The review aggregate website RottenTomatoes.com - which lists that The Fugitive has a 94% "fresh" rating - gives the following critique synopsis: "Exhilarating and intense, this high-impact chase thriller is a model of taught and efficient formula film making." While it has moments of exhilaration, I just think that it had a little too much formula for its own good. I wanted a little bit of suspense, but it just didn't deliver on that point for me.

Overall, The Fugitive is not a bad film, but I personally can't see why it was given so many accolades upon its release in the early '90s. Maybe it's just been copied so much in the past eighteen years that I feel like I've seen it all before when this was the original standard. Or maybe I'm just missing something. It's not a bad film, and it's probably worth a watch, but I can't recommend it with flying colors.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B
1 Thumb Up