Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Ron Perlman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ron Perlman. Show all posts

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Movie Review: DRIVE

DRIVE
2011
R


"If I drive for you, you give me a time and a place. I give you a five-minute window. Anything happens in that five minutes, and I'm yours no matter what. I don't sit in while you're running it down, I don't carry a gun... I drive."
-- Driver



Drive is a 2011 action film directed by Nicolas Winding Refn that centers around a stunt driver who moonlights as a professional getaway car driver. The Driver (Ryan Gosling) also works as a mechanic at his friend Shannon's (Bryan Cranston) garage. The Driver meets his young but beautiful neighbor Irene (Carey Mulligan), who lives alone with her son while her husband Standard (Oscar Isaac) is in prison. The two forge a relationship until Standard comes home, indebted to a couple of mob thugs who helped protect him while he was incarcerated. They tell Standard he needs to rob a pawn shop, and the Driver offers his help out of his affection for the family. However, things go terribly wrong during the heist, and the Driver soon finds himself pit against big-time mobsters Nino (Ron Perlman) and Bernie Rose (Albert Brooks).

To be perfectly honest, I wasn't entirely sure what type of film I was going into as I entered the theater today. I had seen the trailer, but I couldn't tell if I was going to see an action film or a more dramatic piece. The final result was actually a splendid blend of the two. I actually found that Rottentomatoes.com, the online review aggregate, offered a well-stated critical consensus: Drive is a "hyper-stylized blend of striking imagery and violence" that "fully represents a fully realized vision of arthouse action." I honestly don't think I could've said it better myself. There's just something about the look and feel of this film that's just a little bit different than your typical mainstream flick.

The screenplay itself is actually rather fantastic, to be sure. There's a lot of aspects to the story intersecting throughout the film. In a way, there's a lot of intersecting genres as well. We have the crime aspect of the story that dominates most of the film, but we're also getting a little bit of comedy here and there, and you can't deny the romantic storyline as well. I can't quite put my finger on it, but there's something about how the film is written that sucks you into the movie almost immediately. The characters are well-fleshed out, and the actual story keeps you guessing until the final credits role. That's the best type of film.

One of the other strengths of the film is the level of the cast's performances. Gosling is a revelation in the lead role. For most of the film, he keeps himself incredibly reserved, never changing his demeanor in the slightest. As the film continues to progress, however, his façade starts to crack, but he soon regains his composure. It's truly a brilliant performance. Some of the supporting characters are equally talented. Brooks is a revelation as the film's central villain, and even Cranston, Perlman and Isaac make their mark in their limited amount of screen-time. The cast is simply fantastic.

However, the film's real strength lies in its level of direction. I don't often talk about the choices a director has to make, mostly because I don't completely understand the entire directing process. All of the behind-the-camera stuff is a little bit confusing for me, which is why I generally only talk stuff like the screenplay or the acting. Still, there's something different about the feel of this film. I almost felt like it should've been from the 1980s rather than 2011. It's an arthouse film of the highest order. Even the violence and gore seems tastefully done, and that's a tough thing to do here in the 21st century. So I have to give a lot of credit to director Refn for the work he put into this film. Simply astounding, I must say.

Still, I wouldn't quite say that Drive is for everyone. It's very quiet for an action film, and although it's a more easily accessible arthouse flick, any arthouse film is going to block some viewers from being able to access it. However, if you can find a way to get into the film, I know you'll be in for quite a treat.



Movie Review Summary
Grade: A
2 Thumbs Up


Rankings

Best All-Time - #94
Best Drama - #34

Friday, February 11, 2011

Movie Review: SEASON OF THE WITCH

SEASON OF THE WITCH
2011
PG-13



Season of the Witch is a 2011 action thriller that was directed by Dominic Sena and stars Nicolas Cage. When crusaders Behmen (Cage) and Felson (Ron Perlman) desert from their forces, they make their way back towards their homeland. However, they are recognized in a small town, and in order to avoid the punishment for desertion - in a word, death - they agree to accompany a young monk named Debelzaq (Stephen Campbell Moore) to a monastery as he escorts a young woman (Claire Foy), who has been accused of witchery, to her place of judgment. Debelzaq believes that this woman, Anna, is responsible for the onset of the Black Plague that has recently taken the country in its grasp. Along with another knight (Ulrich Thomsen), a swindling guide (Stephen Graham) and a well-meaning altar boy (Robert Sheehan), Behmen and Felson set forth on their quest to find the monastery and commit the woman to her fate.

I'd like to start by saying that I had no real expectations going into watching Season of the Witch (which I shall call SOTW, henceforth). It was originally to be released in March of 2010, but after finding an unfavorable level of competition, Lionsgate elected to push the release to either September or October. Well, September and October came and went, and still no SOTW. Finally, it was granted a release in the first weekend of 2011, making it officially the first piece of garbage to grace our screens in the new year. And yes, I mean garbage.

To be fair, it's nowhere near the worst movie I've ever seen (trust me, I've seen some pretty bad flicks). Our screenplay isn't horrendous, but it's rote and cliché and leaves no room for any imagination. SOTW was supposed to be a supernatural action thriller, but it left out the most important piece: it's not exactly thrilling. In fact, it's terribly dull. There are some action scenes - but they're very few and far between - but they don't do much to rouse the audience from their seats with interest. That's not really a good thing for any type of action movie. The worst insult a film like this could get is that it's dull.

I'd love to take the time to berate the acting in the film because, although it's not terrible, it's just not very good. I think we've all become accustomed to seeing Nicolas Cage in terrible movies (What happened, Nic?! You're an Oscar winner!), and this simply follows the same vein of his recent career path. Perlman is good in his role, providing a little bit of comic relief from time to time, but he can't do enough to save the movie. I think my biggest issue with the acting was that a number of the characters could not find it in their hearts even to attempt a British accent. I mean, we are talking Crusaders here, and we do have a setting in that general area, considering we're dealing with the Plague. But Cage and Perlman and Graham and Sheehan don't even seem to be trying. A British accent isn't that hard to do, and to be honest, I'd have rather heard terrible accents than none at all. I just didn't realize that American accents had come around centuries before the settlement of the Americas. (And no, I'm not bitter.)

If anything's going for the film, it's the musical score. It fits the sweeping landscape well, and had the screenplay and acting been a little bit better, the music would have perfectly accentuated this type of quest. Atli Örvarsson, who also scored 2008's Vantage Point and the just-released-today The Eagle, does well this time around.

All in all, SOTW isn't really worth your time, unless you're into being bored with a movie. Considering that goes against the entire concept of cinema, I don't think many people will share that sentiment. You should probably avoid this one like the Plague (pun intended).

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: D-
2 Thumbs Down

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Movie Review: HELLBOY II: THE GOLDEN ARMY

HELLBOY II: THE GOLDEN ARMY
2008
PG-13


You can watch the trailer here

To be brutally honest, the only reason I even contemplated watching Hellboy II: The Golden Army was because I once had an obsession and desire to watch every movie ever nominated for an Academy Award (Hellboy II was nominated for Best Achievement in Makeup at the 2009 ceremony). However, I have a rule not to watch a sequel or remake without watching the original film, so I watched the first Hellboy film a few months ago. After thoroughly enjoying it, I figured I might as well give the second one, which was also helmed by Guillermo Del Toro, a chance as well.

We open on a young Hellboy/Red hearing the story of the Golden Army from his adoptive father. Fast-forward to present day, where Hellboy/Red (Ron Perlman) and company are still hard at work keeping humanity safe from behind the scenes. Red desires the spotlight, however, and it starts to cause problems - mainly, the public doesn't particularly like him or his kind. When Prince Nuada (Luke Goss) makes his appearance, we learn that he wants to re-establish the Golden Army in order to destroy mankind. Red and company take chase in an attempt to stop him.

The screenplay essentially provides your standard action flick. There's some scenes of dialogue in between the action sequences that are meant to dispel any confusion, but it's not as though the plot is terribly confusing. I mean, it's about a demon-like creature who loves Cuban cigars and Tecate beer and helps save the world. There's nothing complex about that at all. However, we do get a few moments of comedy that caused some laugh-out-loud fun. Keep an eye out for a drunken Barry Manilow duet...

Since most of the cast remains the same as the previous film, there's not much to say about the acting as everyone essentially holds serve with their performances in the first installment. Goss is good as our villain, but he could have been fleshed out a little more in order to be a little more sinister. But it works just fine for this movie's purposes.

Essentially, it's big, mindless fun. There's some pretty good special effects, and it definitely has that undeniable Guillermo Del Toro stamp. If you are a fan of the first Hellboy film, then I don't see why there'd be any reason for you to pass up the sequel, even if it's just to kick back and smile for two hours.


Movie Review Summary:
Grade: B-
Thumb... Up