Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Natalie Portman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natalie Portman. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Happy Birthday, Natalie Portman!

Today, we are celebrating the 31st birthday of actress Natalie Portman. Born Natalie Hershlag in Jerusalem, her family soon moved to the United States and ultimately settled in New York, where she still currently resides. Although she succeeded academically, Portman managed to nab a few film roles as a teenager that started her on her acting journey. It wasn't until her role as Queen Amidala in the Star Wars prequels that she hit superstardom, and those performances helped open a number of doors for her continuing career. At the same time, however, Portman attended Harvard University and graduated with a degree in psychology. In 2009, Portman started to date her Black Swan choreographer Benjamin Millepied. The two have since been married and have a son. Here's a few fun facts and accolades awarded to Natalie Portman throughout her acting career:

Acting
First Film: Léon: The Professional (1994)
Last Film: Thor (2011)
Next Film: Lawless (2013)

Academy Awards
Nominated: Best Supporting Actress, Closer (2004)
Won: Best Actress, Black Swan (2010)

Over the years, I've managed to see twelve of Portman's films, and on average, her films have received a 'B' grade. From these twelve, I have created the following list of my five favorite of her performances: 

5. Grace Cahill
Brothers (2009)

*****

4. Evey
V for Vendetta (2006)

*****

3. Sara
Cold Mountain (2003)

*****

2. Sam
Garden State (2004)

*****

1. Nina Sayers
Black Swan (2010)

Once again, I would like to wish Natalie Portman a happy 31st birthday!

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Movie Review: THOR

THOR
2011
PG-13



Thor is a 2011 superhero action film directed by Kenneth Branagh and serves as the latest addition to the list of films leading to the upcoming "Avengers Initiative" movie set for release next year. The film starts with a flash-forward on Earth as Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) hits Thor (Chris Hemsworth) with her car. We're immediately taken back to Thor's home world of Asgard where we learn that he is the heir apparent to the great king Odin (Anthony Hopkins). However, Thor's arrogance and desire to start a war with the enemy frost giants forces Odin to banish Thor from Asgard and strip him of his supernatural powers. Thor soon finds himself a mortal on Earth, where he meets the aforementioned Jane, a scientist trying to find the secrets to the wormholes first proposed by Einstein. Jane and her fellow scientists Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgård) and Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings) try to make sense of the seemingly crazed ramblings of Thor as they try to piece together from where he may have come. The group soon learns of a mysterious "satellite" crash near where they found Thor, which immediately piques the Asgardian's interest as he realizes the satellite is, in fact, his hammer Mjölnir. With Jane's help, he makes his way to the site which has been surrounded by government security, but he soon realizes that without his immortality, he cannot control Mjölnir. As Thor struggles to find a way back to Asgard, he learns of the nefarious plot concocted by his brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston) and swears to defend both Asgard and Earth from his rule.

I'd like to start by saying that I am not a fan of the source comics and have never been one. I don't think I've ever read a comic book of any kind, to be honest, but I just think that should be mentioned as I try to explain my opinion of this film. In a way, I was able to go into the film without any real expectations, so I could view it simply as a film rather than an adaptation. I've had conversations with avid Marvel fans who span the entire spectrum of enjoyment with Thor - some said they loved it, others said they hated it, but they all mentioned that they based their opinion on whether or not they felt it reflected the comic books well. I will not be doing that; instead, I'll be looking at this as a stand-alone film despite the fact that I know it's anything but.

I had some hesitations going into the film based on the trailers I had seen in the previous few months. In fact, there was enough hesitation that I did not place Thor on my list of the twenty-five summer films I was most excited to see. Something about the trailers made it look a little bit on the unsatisfying side, and I'd have to say that I feel like I hit the nail on the head with my original feelings. While the film wasn't horrendous by any means, it lacked any real spark that could possibly propel it towards anything beyond being "good."

I actually didn't know that Branagh had directed the film until the day of its release, and the moment I heard it, I had some qualms. Branagh is a classically trained Shakespearean actor and director who has deftly taken on such famous titles as Henry V, Hamlet and Frankenstein. But how would he do with a superhero comic book adaptation? I've heard reports that Branagh has been a massive Thor fan since he was a child, so that precision should have translated into a well thought-out endeavor. However, things just seemed a little amiss throughout this one.

The screenplay wasn't anything spectacular, giving us a rather predictable storyline aided by some very simplistic dialogue. From the first moment, even non-comic book readers like myself should be able to guess exactly how this one's going to end, and that doesn't do much in terms of hooking the viewer into the movie. And while not atrocious, the dialogue spoken throughout the film seemed so simple and easy that it just wasn't realistic. It's difficult not to compare this film to its Iron Man predecessors, but part of the reason those films worked so well is because the dialogue was fresh and interesting. In Thor, it's just a little bit stale, and it's hard to imagine that anyone would speak in such a manner.

To be fair, the Iron Man films are lucky enough to have the ever-fabulous Robert Downey Jr., and unfortunately, no one in Thor comes within a thousand miles of his brilliance. Our lead is Hemsworth, whose largest film role prior to this one was his cameo appearance in the beginning of 2009's Star Trek. He definitely has the look for Thor, but his acting bravado just isn't quite enough to make him a captivating lead for this particular film. Sadly, we'll have to see some more of him in the Avengers film, and I can already tell you that he's going to be pushed to the side by Downey and Chris Evans, who will appear as Captain America. Considering the rest of Thor's cast, we should have seen something a little bit better than what we get. Recent Oscar winner Portman mails in a performance that's not bad but not good by any means. Skarsgård and Hiddleston are decent but nothing spectacular. Dennings probably gives the most realistic performance in the film, but she's not given much screen-time. And even the "great" Anthony Hopkins isn't all that great. I could make an argument towards the "greatness" of Hopkins' overall acting ability, but I won't bog down this review with that particular argument.

If anything works extremely well in the film, it's the musical composition which definitely deserves mention. Patrick Doyle does well with the score that fits the scene almost perfectly. It's always there, but it's never so strong that it dominates the film. It does exactly what a film score should do: complement the events on-screen without taking them over.

Overall, Thor is a pedestrian addition to the annals of superhero film history. I understand its necessity in crafting a prelude to the character as he enters the Avengers film, but there just wasn't anything that was going to blow you away. It's not quite good, but it's not quite bad - it's just found a niche somewhere in the middle, but that doesn't necessarily bode well for its longevity. I'd say save your money and wait for the DVD unless you desperately think you need to see it on the big screen for the visual effects (which were, admittedly, quite good even if they were a tad bit frantic). But visual effects don't make a successful film - screenplay and acting do, and in those facets, Thor just doesn't entirely succeed.

(Oh, and as is the new norm with Marvel flicks, don't forget to wait through all the credits for one last scene. It might seem like a long time - the credits span seven minutes - but if you're interested, you'll probably want to sit through them all for that one last bit).

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: C+
0.5 Thumbs Up

Friday, April 8, 2011

Movie Review: YOUR HIGHNESS

YOUR HIGHNESS
2011
R



Your Highness is a 2011 action comedy directed by David Gordon Green that follows the story of two princes as they venture on a quest to save the eldest brother's bride-to-be. When Prince Fabious (James Franco) returns from a quest with a young maiden named Belladonna (Zooey Deschanel), he tells the kingdom that he intends to marry her immediately. This causes quite a stir with Fabious's younger brother, Prince Thadeous (Danny McBride) who believes that Fabious has always stolen the spotlight from him. On the day of the wedding, the evil wizard Leezar (Justin Theroux) kidnaps Belladonna in order to use her in a sacrificial ceremony that will grant him power over an unstoppable dragon. Fabious immediately sets after the wizard, and he drags a reluctant Thadeus alongside him. Joined by Thadeus's man-servant Courtney (Rasmus Hardiker) and teaming forces with a mysterious young warrior named Isabel (Natalie Portman), the two princes set out to rescue the distressed damsel and save the entire kingdom.

I originally heard about Your Highness last summer after a friend was able to see an advance screening of the film, and I had anxiously awaited its release from that point forward. When you have a film that stars now Oscar-nominee James Franco and now Oscar-winner Natalie Portman, you can be sure that expectations may be a little bit high. Unfortunately, I felt as though Your Highness fell a little bit flat, but it has nothing to do with either aforementioned Oscar-nominated star.

No, there's a couple of issues with this film that stand strikingly strong above anything that resembles "goodness." For starters, there's some serious issues with the screenplay. While the storyline is a tad predictable, it services well and proves to be rather inventive, even if we know exactly where it's headed all throughout. However, "inventive" doesn't necessarily save a film from being convoluted; it almost seemed as though the plot moved from one instance to the next without having any real segue between scenes. There's enough cohesion between the story's parts to make it understandable, but at times, I was scratching my head in wonder of why a particular scene needed to be in the film. The biggest problem with the screenplay, however, is the issue of dialogue. A lot of this has to do with the fact that Danny McBride is our lead - more on that in a moment - because we get the necessary drivel accompanied by many of his on-screen characters. The filmmakers could have had a soaring action comedy, but they chose instead to weigh it down with over-sexualized dialogue that would appeal mostly to teenage boys. Beneath all the raunchy jokes and necessity for on-screen nudity, there's a good film hidden; unfortunately, there's just no way anyone could ever dig it all out.

On with the acting. As previously stated, I have no real issue with either Franco or Portman's performances. Franco brings a boyish whimsy to his role, and you get the sense that despite Fabious's many accolades, he has yet to truly grow into manhood. Isabel is a stone-cold killer for most of the film, and Portman brings a strong masculinity to the role that plays rather effectively. Some of the supporting characters, such as Hardiker's Courtney and Theroux's Leezar, are good for a couple of laughs here and there, but they're mostly expendable. No, the real issue here is McBride himself. Being that he co-wrote the screenplay, I can only think that he wrote it mostly with himself in mind to play the lead. As I explained in my review of 2011's The Green Hornet, where Seth Rogen proved to be similarly guilty, writing a role specifically for oneself may not always be the best way to go. McBride stands out too conflictingly in his role, and in my opinion, it brings the film down a notch or two... or ten.

I do have to say that Steve Jablonsky, who has scored films like 2005's The Island and the Transformers franchise, provides some very good musical accompaniment for this film. The sweeping orchestral forms provide an epic-like backdrop for the movie, and in this case, it wholly succeeds.

Overall, Your Highness is probably a movie that you can miss, but I'm sure plenty of people will venture to theaters to see it. It's going to ride on the fact that it's by the guys who brought us 2008's Pineapple Express, but Your Highness doesn't come close to reaching that movie's potential. If you're interested in some big, stupid fun, then this movie might be right up your alley, but if you're looking for something slightly more credible than potty humor, please steer clear.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: C-
0.5 Thumbs Up

Friday, December 3, 2010

Movie Review: BLACK SWAN

BLACK SWAN
2010
R

You can watch the trailer here

When a film generates as much Oscar buzz as Black Swan has since its arrival at film festivals a few months ago, you can be sure I'll be one of the first in line to see it. I had an opportunity to see the film about a month ago at an early screening, but it conflicted with my work schedule, so I had to wait like the rest of society. Due to its limited release, I had to drive about forty minutes away on the freeway in order to see the movie, and let me tell you right now: it was one of the best decisions I have ever made.

Black Swan follows a young ballerina named Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman) who is vying for the lead role in the company's upcoming rendition of "Swan Lake." After all her hard work, she is finally awarded the part, but this proves to be a little bit problematic. Thomas (Vincent Cassel), the director of the ballet, has re-imagined the role for the lead to play both the White Swan and the Black Swan, a feat which he believes Nina unable to fulfill. She struggles throughout the film as she tries to embody both roles, all the while fighting off an apparent opponent for the part in Lily (Mila Kunis) who appears to be doing everything in her power to sabotage Nina's chance at stardom.

To be honest, I wasn't a huge fan of the screenplay for most of the movie. I thought it was good, but everything seemed to be held together by Portman's performance (more on that in a second). However, the final scenes of the film are really the selling point. I won't go into detail because I would never want to ruin the surprise, but I will say that I found the final resolution to be absolutely beautiful.

And now, where can I even begin with Miss Natalie Portman? I've been a fan of hers since I first saw her grace a screen (although for much of that time, it was purely based on her stunning beauty). However, I gradually began to see her expand as an actress, and when I heard about Black Swan about a year ago, I began to let myself grow an eager excitement. Ladies and gentlemen, she does not disappoint. Portman takes us through every stage of stress-induced psychosis, all the way to the film's final scene. The character arc she brings is extreme, and she really got the chance to show off her wide range. It should be noted that Cassel and Kunis, as well as Barbara Hershey (who plays Nina's mother), are all very good themselves, but this really is Natalie's show. I can definitely see an Oscar in her near future.

If anyone else deserves a commendation, it's Darren Aronofsky for his stellar direction. I don't often talk about the director's role in the filmmaking process, but here, it bears mention. Aronofsky, whose previous films include Requiem for a Dream and The Wrestler, holds nothing back this time around. He has placed his stamp on a trippy set of films, and Black Swan is definitely no different. He creates a fascinating world of seeming insanity, and we can see and feel the emotional distress that Nina feels as she slowly loses her mind. I honestly can't really explain this all - I'm drawing a blank as to how to word it - but Aronofsky has easily put forth his best career effort with this film.

I could probably go on and on about the psychology of this film (trust me, I could talk for hours on end about it), but I'll spare you all that for the moment. However, I have found a rather fascinating review from The Globe and Mail's Rick Groen about the film that you may enjoy. Trust me when I say that you should absolutely see this film. I know I'll be making another trek to the theater to see it one more time, although I'll be waiting until the release expands to somewhere a little closer. But please, do yourself a favor and see this movie.


Movie Review Summary:
Grade
: A
Current All-Time Rank: Best - #23
Thumb... Up

Addition to Awards