Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Jim Broadbent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim Broadbent. Show all posts

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Movie Review: INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL

INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL
2008
PG-13


"How much of human life is lost in waiting?"
-- Professor 'Ox' Oxley

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a 2008 action-adventure film directed by Steven Spielberg that serves as the fourth installment in the Indiana Jones franchise. Released nineteen years after The Last Crusade, this new adventure with Indiana Jones took a very different turn than its predecessors. The film opens on the 1950s, where an aged Indiana (Harrison Ford) has been taken captive by a group of Russian KGB operatives led by a Dr. Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett). At gunpoint, Indiana helps the Russians steal a classified box from a secret warehouse, but he does not know exactly what the box's contents contain. After being returned home, he thinks himself done with the situation until a young man named Mutt (Shia LaBeouf) seeks him out to tell him that a mutual friend named Professor 'Ox' Oxley (John Hurt) has been captured by the same Russians in connection with the box they stole. The two make their way to South America to find Ox, and it is there that they learn that their friend had found himself caught in a plot to find a legendary city called Akator by using an equally legendary artifact known as the crystal skull. Indiana and Mutt start to piece together the puzzle that Ox has left for them, but the Russians are soon on their tail once again, eager to find Akator first.

I would like to start this post by telling you a story. I was a sophomore in college in Santa Cruz when Kingdom of the Crystal Skull hit theaters, and like most other Indy fans, I was rather excited to see it. So excited, in fact, that I made the trek down to the local theater for the midnight screening on opening night. The theater was sold out, and fans were lined up around the block to see Ford don the fedora for the fourth time, so you can imagine our audience's anticipation as we sat impatiently waiting for the opening credits to roll.

Fast forward to a little over two hours later, and you would have found me walking out of the theater talking nothing but trash about this film. After that first go-around, I hated it. I despised it. I though that Spielberg had found a way to destroy one of my childhood cinematic heroes. And for that, I was rightfully angry. It took me a few days, but after I thought about the film for a while, I started to come around and think that maybe it wasn't as horrendous as I had originally thought. I soon came home for the summer, and I had the chance to view the film again per my father's request, and seeing Kingdom of the Crystal Skull actually helped to open my eyes to its concepts and themes a little bit more.

I always hear quite a bit of opposition towards this film when I talk about it amongst my friends and my readers, and I can somewhat see their point. I am in now way going to spend hours here trying to convince you of why this film fits into the Indiana Jones canon - although I may save that project for a later date - but I think that I should at least tell you why I happen to enjoy the film. Because so many people did not like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, many actually forget that it managed to secure relatively positive reviews amongst the critical community. On Rottentomatoes.com, the film holds a seventy-seven percent approval rating and holds the following critical consensus:
Though the plot elements are certainly familiar, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull still delivers the thrills, and Harrison Ford's return to the title role is more than welcome.
Even more indicating of the critical response is the film's score of sixty-five on Metacritic.com, which correlates to "generally favorable reviews." Still, so many of the fans have yet to come around, and I'm sure I know why.

Ultimately, it all boils down to the fact that Kingdom of the Crystal Skull does not measure up to its predecessors. Because those films set such a lofty bar, it would have been nearly impossible to reach that particular goal. Still, fans were deservedly spoiled by the first three installments, so why shouldn't they expect something the same, right? But enough of this vagueness. Let's talk about why I like this film.

For starters, I like the story. I think it's an original tale of something that an over-the-top archaeologist like Indiana Jones might actually find himself looking for. Sure, there are some snags here and there, but to be fair, none of the Indiana Jones flicks are perfect. They all have flaws here and there, and Kingdom just has a few more that it couldn't quite work out. But the storyline works well and flows incredibly well, and it manages to keep you wondering where it might actually be going. Let's be honest - did any of us really expect those climactic scenes in Akator? I think not, and I think that's why so many people have spoken out against it. But the story itself works and proves to be entertaining.

I also thought the cast proved to be effective as well. Ford does a fine job reprising his role from nearly twenty years earlier, and he plays the part to a tee considering how much he's aged. I also think that Blanchett was a good addition to the cast list, and her star power alone makes this one worth a gander. Some of my readers will know that I'm not much of a Shia LaBeouf fan, but after re-watching this today, I have to say that I'm not entirely turned off by his performance. It works well with the context of the story, and he's really not as central as I had remembered. John Hurt gives a fine performance in a supporting role, but it's so out there that I think most people overlooked it. Also be on the watch for decent supporting roles from the likes of Ray Winstone, Jim Broadbent and Karen Allen, who returns as Marion Ravenwood.

At the end of the day, there's no way that Kingdom of the Crystal Skull can ever be compared to the rest of the Indiana Jones franchise. However, that does not make it a terrible film. I think it's a movie that polarized a lot of viewers at the time of its release, but by giving it another chance now, I think many of them might be able to see past their original insecurities. Ultimately, it's an entertaining romp through the Indy universe, and for that, I think we should all be glad.


Movie Review Summary
Grade: B
Should You Watch It? Yes

Monday, January 30, 2012

Movie Review: THE IRON LADY

THE IRON LADY
2011
PG-13


"It used to be about trying to do something. Now it's about trying to be someone."
-- Margaret Thatcher

The Iron Lady is a 2011 drama directed by Phyllida Lloyd that centers around the story of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. As an elderly woman, Margaret Thatcher (Meryl Streep) is slowly losing her battle with dementia, and she starts to reminisce about the major events in her life. As a young woman (played by Alexandra Roach), Margaret was led by a series of ideals that propelled her to her start in politics. As time went by, she and her husband Denis (Jim Broadbent) determined she should make a run for the office of Prime Minister, a bid that she ultimately won. The story then tells of the major events that took place while she was in office, ultimately leading to the story's present day.

After scoring two Academy Award nominations, I knew I had to give The Iron Lady a viewing. It had been on my radar for quite some time, since it has had quite a bit of buzz since its initial announcement. A lot of the buzz has been centered around Meryl Streep, and it's usually well-deserved when she appears in a film. Seeing as one of this film's Oscar nominations is for Streep's performance, then there must be some truth to the buzz, right?

I'll start with the acting, considering I've started to mention it already. Streep is great as our leading lady, but there never should've been any doubt with that. She won the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Drama, so it's probably safe to say she's one of the front-runners at this year's Academy Awards. Do I think she deserves to win? Perhaps not, but that doesn't necessarily mean that she's terrible. It's a fine role, and she plays it to a tee. The rest of the cast fills out nicely, with some good performances from the likes of Broadbent and Roach, who especially surprised me as the younger version of Streep's character. The rest of the cast is used rather fleetingly, but they're solid in their background roles. Overall, it's a good ensemble cast.

Sadly, I had quite a bit of issue with the film's screenplay, which ultimately mires the film in a bit of a humdrum tone. There's something a little off with the film's storytelling, and it was difficult to stay engaged with the movie as a whole. While the dialogue and the writing seems fine, there really isn't that great of a hook to the film, so from the outset, I just felt like I was on the outside-looking-in rather than having a feeling of being encompassed by the movie. The best films know how to draw their audience into the story and keep them there for the film's entirety, but The Iron Lady never actually sucks the viewer into its story, ultimately making it a bit of a bore to watch. If a film cannot keep its audience engaged, it's going to lose it and lose it quickly. It's just sad to see it happen here, especially when it's already happened with another recent film - the Leonardo DiCaprio-starring J. Edgar.

At the end of the day, The Iron Lady spoils a fine Streep performance by miring itself in a very lackadaisical attitude and tone. Despite tackling a new political figure, the film simply felt unoriginal. I feel as though it mixed a good blend of the aforementioned J. Edgar with films like The King's Speech and The Ides of March. Unfortunately, that particular blend does not play out well on the screen, and despite the cast's best efforts, there just isn't a strong enough screenplay to bring this movie out of the doldrums.



Movie Review Summary
Grade: C+
0.5 Thumbs Down

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Movie Review: ARTHUR CHRISTMAS

ARTHUR CHRISTMAS
2011
PG


"Dear Santa, are you real? If you live at the North Pole, how come I can't see you house when I look on Google Earth?"
-- Gwen


Arthur Christmas is a 2011 animated comedy directed by Barry Cook and Sarah Smith that offers a rather original holiday story. With the world so overly-populated in today's society, the current Santa Claus (voiced by Jim Broadbent) utilizes some new technological advances in order to make his annual trip around the world delivering gifts. With the help of his eldest son Steve (voiced by Hugh Laurie), the two circumnavigate the globe in their massive command aircraft and deliver two billion presents; however, it is soon discovered that one child was missed. When this comes to the attention of Santa's younger son Arthur (voiced by James McAvoy), who has been relegated to writing return letters to the children who wrote to Santa, he feels the need to return the gift despite his father and brother's lackluster desire to do the same. So, with the help of his Grandsanta (voiced by Bill Nighy), Arthur takes the old sleigh on a trek to England to deliver the final gift of the Christmas season.

I first started hearing about Arthur Christmas around last year's holiday season, and because it was so close to Christmas 2010, I thought it might be getting ready for a late 2010 release. However, the film was still under production at that point, and it wasn't until summer 2011 that we got a teaser trailer to see what this film might be about. I knew that the film would be British-centric considering the caliber of acting star-power lending their vocal talents, but aside from that, I wasn't entirely sure what to expect until a legitimate trailer (posted at the end of this review) was released. Early reviews posited that the film should be a smash success, so it was only a matter of time until I was able to give the film a viewing.

I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised with the final product presented in Arthur Christmas. We're getting a rather splendid screenplay that gives a completely different view of Santa than we've seen in films past. While Santa himself is an older, bumbling man, he relies heavily on his son Steve who is the real brains behind their high-tech operation. The film's opening sequence, which illustrates how this Santa delivers gifts to children in today's modern society, is quite a sight to behold, and it has both an action-y and comedic feel. It isn't until after the opening salvo that we actually meet our titular character and start to learn about his personality. After the successful Christmas mission, we learn that one child has been left present-less, and when Arthur and his Grandsanta decide to embark on their own mission to deliver that gift, the screenplay becomes even greater. The rest of the film serves as a clash between the old and the new, showing both the pros and cons of each point of view. The final scenes of the film, however, show that all the bickering and arguing over who's method works more effectively is ultimately a moot point in light of the true spirit of Christmas. This screenplay brings comedy, adventure and a healthy heaping of heart, and it works exceptionally well from start to finish.

As I previously mentioned, we're getting some high-caliber acting power bringing the vocal work this time around, and everyone is pretty much on their A-game. McAvoy is fantastic as our lead, playing the clumsy worrywart Arthur to a tee. In complete contrast, Laurie brings a headstrong and confident Steve to the screen, offering quite the foil for our central protagonist. Also offering a strong performance is Ashley Jensen, who plays the gift-wrapping elf Bryony who aides Arthur and Grandsanta in their insane endeavor. Also be on the listen for Imelda Staunton, who does well as Mrs. Claus. Overall, the vocal talent is simply fantastic and fits the film quite well.

At the end of the day, Arthur Christmas is a well-made animated film that's sure to delight audiences this holiday season. I'm sure you'll still be able to find it in a theater near you, and if you haven't given it a chance, you just might want to do so. And if you're in the mood for some new Christmas fare, then this one's right up your alley. I can assure you that you haven't seen anything quite like it before.



Movie Review Summary
Grade: A-
2 Thumbs Up