Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Dudley Moore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dudley Moore. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Movie Review: SANTA CLAUS

SANTA CLAUS
1985
PG


"Now, all those within the sound of my voice, and all those on this Earth everywhere know that henceforth you will be called Santa Claus."
-- Ancient Elf

Santa Claus is a 1985 family film directed by Jeannot Szwarc that tells the story of the origins of Santa Claus himself before giving him a contemporary problem to face. The man who would be Santa Claus (David Huddleston) lived a humble life delivering toys to the children of his village on Christmas Eve, but after his wife Anya (Judy Cornwell) and he are caught in a snowstorm on year, the two magically find themselves surrounded by elves who lead them to a mystical factory at the North Pole. According to an ancient prophesy, this man was destined to become Santa Claus, and so, he begins to take his gift-giving on a global scale for all of eternity. Fast-forward to the present day, and a slightly disgruntled elf named Patch (Dudley Moore) who desperately wants to impress Santa with his toy-making skills makes his way to New York city and joins with a big-time toymaker B.Z. (John Lithgow) to create the next big sensation for the mass consumer public, forcing Santa to reconsider his entire toy-making philosophy.

I can honestly say that I had never heard of this film before doing a quick search on NetFlix for a fancy holiday movie to watch this evening. Unlike many of the other films I've reviewed during this holiday season, this one just hasn't quite been on anyone's radar, and after giving it a viewing, I'd have to say there's probably a good reason for such. Critically, the film never garnered much success - it currently holds an 18% approval rating on Rottentomatoes.com - and it hasn't fared much better with your average reviewing public (the Internet Movie Database lists its current score as a 5.2 out of a possible 10.0). Despite the negative feedback that the film has received, I still held out hope that it might prove to be at least moderately enjoyable.

Sadly, the film falls short of any real expectations. The screenplay can be split into two sections, almost two acts, if you will. The first act focuses on Santa's origins, and to be fair, that part of the story fascinated me more than the second part. Sure, the filmmakers made every attempt to include as many Santa and Christmas clichés as possible, but despite that, it still serves as an interesting version of how the many may have taken up his duties. The film's second act, however, fails to stir even the slightest bit of imagination. I feel like I've seen it all before: a former employee decides to go against his former boss by helping out the main competition. How many films have followed that storyline in the past? It seems tried and tested, and under the Christmas lights, it just doesn't seem to fit all that well. The film turned sour and ultimately a bit boring, and I had to fight to keep my attention with the screen.

What's worse is that our acting ensemble doesn't exactly pick up the slack. While there are some recognizable faces, there's no one who's really giving all that great of a performance. While I've personally never heard of our titular lead Huddleston, a quick look at his acting career shows that he's appeared in such big-time films as 1974's Blazing Saddles and, perhaps most famously, as the titular character in 1998's The Big Lebowski. However, he doesn't offer much in terms of a role here, despite playing a Santa Claus that I think we all could wish was the real one. We're also getting some spotty performances from some bigger names like Oscar nominees Moore and Lithgow, who are both too over-the-top to be believed in any way imaginable. We're also getting some moderately bad performances from our two child actors - Christian Fitzpatrick and Carrie Kei Heim - but I don't want to stomp on them too much. The only person who offers even a slightly is Cornwell as Mrs. Claus, but she's used so sparsely that it's almost impossible to notice.

Ultimately, Santa Claus is probably a Christmas film that you should pass. It's not really offering anything all that fascinating, and I personally couldn't find a way to keep myself engaged with the characters or the storyline. Still, I can't completely bash it because it does have quite a dash of Christmas spirit. That being said, I still don't think it's worth the time or the effort to watch it, so watch it at your own discretion.



Movie Review Summary
Grade: F
1.5 Thumbs Down

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Movie Review: ARTHUR

ARTHUR
1981
PG



Arthur is a 1981 comedy directed by Steve Gordon. It follows Arthur Bach (Dudley Moore), the grown son of extremely wealthy parents, as he is pressured into an arranged marriage with a similarly wealthy daughter named Susan Johnson (Jill Eikenberry). Arthur is a bit of a man-child, never taking the opportunity to "grow up." He spends his money frivolously and drinks more than anyone has ever seen. He doesn't love Susan, but his father (Thomas Barbour) tells him that he will be cut off from the family's riches if he refuses to marry her. Just after agreeing to the marriage, Arthur meets Linda Marolla (Liza Minnelli) when he catches her stealing a tie from a store. The two share an immediate connection, and Arthur asks her on a date to which Linda readily agrees. Arthur soon finds himself falling in love with Linda - and it seems as though the feeling is mutual - but the looming marriage causes him great concern. However, with the help of his trusty butler and best friend Hobson (Sir John Gielgud), Arthur works towards winning Linda's heart despite his family's wishes.

To be fair, I only really watched this film today because I wanted to see it before the upcoming remake (starring Russell Brand and Helen Mirren) is released this Friday. I generally don't like to see sequels or remakes without having seeing the original fare first, so getting this one out of the way opens up the possibility for me to see the new version this weekend. But I digress... This Arthur actually came with quite a few accolades. For example, it was nominated for four Academy Awards back in 1982, and it won two of them (Best Supporting Actor and Best Original Song). So I had some high hopes going into the flick, and although they weren't completely met, Arthur still proves to be a fun ride.

The acting isn't really the issue here, although I don't think it's quite as brilliant as its accolades might suggest. Moore scored one of the Oscar nominations for his leading role, and although he's rather funny for the film's entirety, I didn't really see too much of a character arc for him. Actually, there's really not a strong arc for any of the characters, but I suppose that's more of an issue for the screenplay than the actual acting. Moore is bitingly hilarious during his drunken binges - and trust me, there's quite a few of them - but I would have liked to see him pull it back a little bit more than he was given the chance. The over-the-top happy drunk routine got a little old after a while. Minnelli also does well with her role, bringing a bit of sarcastic sass to the screen that helps move the story along. Gielgud is probably the best one in the film - he nabbed the Oscar win for his supporting role - but I felt like he was completely underutilized. I would have liked to see much more of him, but there's nothing I can do about that. His scenes are golden, however.

And now to the screenplay. As I mentioned before, there isn't a strong character arc for anyone in the film, but there are some small arcs that don't pack much of an emotional punch. With everything that's going on in the film, the filmmakers had the opportunity to craft something powerful, but I felt like they held back just a little too much. Also, I felt like everything that happens to Arthur in the film comes just a little too easily. He never really has to fight for anything he wants, and maybe that was the purpose (the character had never had to "fight" for anything in the past, so why should he start now?). But when a somewhat forbidden love is brought into the mix, I would have liked to see a little more punch from Arthur as he fought for Linda. As it stands, it all just flows too easily, and the conflicts in the film just aren't emphasized at all. There's never really any question as to how the film will end, and I just wish there could've been some speed bumps along the way.

As I previously stated, the film also scored an Academy Award for Best Original Song, winning for the song "Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)." I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the song, but maybe you'll enjoy it. I've embedded it here for your listening pleasure:



Overall, Arthur is quite funny, if only for the performances. Don't expect to be blown away by the screenplay or anything, but just enjoy Dudley Moore and Sir John Gielgud as best you can. After seeing this, I'm not sure how I'll feel about the remake, but it should play a little better to my tastes considering the time period. But we shall see.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: C+
1 Thumb Up