Followers

This Movie Guy Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Danny DeVito. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Danny DeVito. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Movie Review: GET SHORTY

GET SHORTY
1995
R



Get Shorty is a 1995 comedy crime thriller directed by Barry Sonnenfeld. It centers around the making of a movie in Hollywood. Chili Palmer (John Travolta), a Miami-based loan shark, is sent by his boss, Ray "Bones" Baroni (Dennis Farina) to find a dry cleaner owner who owes him $300,000. Chili's search takes him to Los Angeles, where he decides to spend a little time dabbling in his real passion: filmmaking. After breaking into the home of Hollywood starlet Karen Flores (Rene Russo), Chili meets low-budget film kingpin Harry Zimm (Gene Hackman) and pitches a movie based on his recent experiences. The two decide to go into business together, which leads Chili towards learning the ins and outs of Hollywood finances and bribery. He meets Harry's other major financier, a local drug runner named Bo (Delroy Lindo), who is also trying to break into the Hollywood producing scene. He and Chili begin to court Harry with a number of offers in an attempt to sway him towards their bill for finances. However, Chili also has to deal with the job he was assigned, and when Ray Bones makes his way to L.A., Chili finds himself in a bit of a pickle.

I've known about this flick for quite a while but just never took the time to sit down and watch it. I think it really came into my consciousness when its sequel, 2005's Be Cool, was released, but I vaguely remember hearing about it back when it first came out. Granted, I was only seven, but that's a little irrelevant. However, it was mentioned in Steven Jay Schneider's 101 Gangster Films You Must See Before You Die, so I figured now was as good a time as any to give it a viewing.

The first thing I think you'll notice is just how fresh the film's dialogue is. Now, it's not that the dialogue is anything stunning, but it fits the constructs of the movie so well that it automatically makes everything believable. You can say what you want about John Travolta - especially after the tumultuous couple of years he's had recently - but as soon as Chili Palmer starts talking, you'll be absolutely hooked. Now, if you've seen my explanation of my grading system, you'll know that a big chunk of a film's final score comes down to acting as well as the movie's screenplay. I didn't go into detail about what it takes to have a good screenplay (but I really should have), but I'll give a basic rundown here. For me, a great screenplay comes down to two pieces: the film's story and the film's dialogue. You can have a brilliantly-crafted story, but if your characters' dialogue isn't believable, your final score is going to suffer. The same goes for the opposite. However, Get Shorty hits on both pistons, grabbing hold and never once letting go. We have a great storyline that comes full circle (in more ways than one), and the dialogue is so crisp and refreshing that I couldn't help but believe that the actors had transformed into the characters themselves.

That being said, a brilliant screenplay is nothing without execution. Here's an analogy: in football, a coach can call a brilliant play, but if the star player falls down, it's going to look like a bonehead call. The same goes for movies. A screenwriter can craft something absolutely beautiful or original, but if the actors can't bring their game up to that level, it's going to come out a little bit stale. Fortunately for Sonnenfeld, Get Shorty was blessed with an all-star cast that rises to the occasion. I've already mentioned Travolta who was absolutely fantastic. In fact, he nabbed a Golden Globe win for this role back in the day. However, the great acting doesn't end with him. Each actor plays his or her part to near-perfection. Special mention should be given to the always-fantastic Hackman because he doesn't disappoint here either. It should also be noted that Danny DeVito also gives a strong supporting performance, and James Gandolfini is good for a laugh here and there. Even Bette Midler joins the mix for a couple of scenes.

Although the movie does run a little bit too long (there were definitely some scenes that could've been edited a little bit), Get Shorty is still a fascinating watch and a heck of a good time. Try to pay close attention to the dialogue. It's so strong, and if you're able to catch it all, I'm sure you won't be disappointed.

Movie Review Summary:
Grade: A-
1.5 Thumbs Up

Monday, October 25, 2010

Movie Review: WHEN IN ROME

WHEN IN ROME
2010
PG-13


You can watch the trailer here

I guess everybody needs a paycheck every now and again.

It's not to say that I had extremely high hopes going into When in Rome - in all honesty, I watched it on a whim at the expense of my boredom - but I could have hoped for a little more than what I got. With a cast speckled with some well-known names in comedy, it's sad to think that their talent was wasted so easily. Director Mark Steven Johnson should have been able to do a little bit more.

At the beginning of the film, we find ourselves following Beth (Kristen Bell), a workaholic New Yorker with no time for love. On a trip to Rome for her sister's wedding, she thinks she may have found a quality guy in Nick (Josh Duhamel), but when she sees him with another woman, she plunges herself into a literal "fountain of love" (based off the real Trevi Fountain) where she proceeds to remove five coins from the bottom of the fountain. Unbeknownst to her, when a coin is removed from the fountain, the person who threw the coin in will fall in love with the person who removed it. From this point, we see a quartet of men following Beth to New York, stalking her everywhere she goes, and all the while, Beth is trying to fall in love with Nick.

Now tell me: does any of this sound familiar to anyone else? I have often blamed the romantic comedy genre for being much too cliché, and When in Rome only helps to prove my theory. In a sense, we've got our basic rom-com storyline (girl meets boy; girl falls for boy; girl gets boy) with a few minor twists and tweaks to make it seem fresh. However, at its heart, it's the same old tale, stale and unoriginal.

I don't personally have a problem with Kristen Bell, although there has been some talk that film studios are trying to make her America's new sweetheart, and I can see where they're coming from. With films like this one and You Again, it's hard to argue that she's been getting a good number of starring comedic roles in recent past. She plays her usual self here, and it works for what it's worth, but it's nothing really special. Duhamel certainly carries a good amount of charm, and it's always nice to see him on the screen, but he really didn't have much to work with this time around. Maybe stick to those oh-so-wonderfully-written Transformers flicks? (Read: sarcasm).

If anything's working in When in Rome, it's the four potential suitors chasing Beth all over New York. They all bring something a little different to the table: Will Arnett plays an Italian (or is he?) artist; Jon Heder comes in as a street-side magician; Dax Shepard plays a male model (and giant tool - a character he has come to perfect over the years); and Danny DeVito plays a sausage company king. They all bring a certain quirkiness necessary for each of their characters, and they all help to spur the realizations about love that Beth desperately needed to find. However, I just feel as though there were too many guys gracing the screen at once. If Beth would have only had to deal with one or two stalkers, I think the movie would have been a little more manageable; as it stands now, however, it's just a bit of an overload.

Oh, and a couple cameos, from the likes of Efren Ramirez, Shaq and Keir O'Donnell, prove to be pretty funny as well.

All in all, When in Rome is supposed to be a comedy, so it's overall success lies in whether it could actually make me laugh. Aside from a couple of random chuckles here and there, I just could not find the humor in it. It started off a little to silly and slapsticky for me to want to take it seriously later in the film, and that greatly hurt its chances of being a quality film. I do concede that I was not the target audience for this flick, but my review stands as is.


Movie Review Summary:
Grade
: F
Thumb... Down